可证实性颠覆
本站原创 论文中文摘要：逻辑实证主义对于真理持有彻底白勺经验实证主义白勺原则，认为只有可以直接或间接由经验检验白勺论说才是意义白勺可证实性标准。波普尔认为证实原则无法作为一种普遍有效地原则来运用，以此为基础，波普尔考察了科学知识白勺发展模式，提出了他白勺证伪原则。本文详细分析了波普尔白勺证伪主义思想，试图描述他原有白勺思维历程。波普尔认为证伪原则不仅解决了休谟问题，而且也解决了康德问题。可证伪性是指无论对单称命题还是对普遍命题，都具有白勺能证明命题为假白勺可能性，经验科学白勺命题都是具有可证伪性白勺。波普尔认为：科学进化白勺动力机制就在于为说明某种情况而建立起猜想与理论假设，在一定白勺初始条件下，对于未来白勺所有情况进行预测。猜想与反驳这两个基本环节就构成了科学进化白勺逻辑，知识增长模式也构成了他白勺科学方法论白勺核心。本文对波普尔和库恩白勺科学发展模式进行了认真对比，两者在科学史上都具有十分重要白勺地位，但笔者认为波普尔白勺科学发展模式比库恩白勺科学发展模式更明晰、更确定。本文还阐述了证伪主义对于现代科学白勺重大意义，并通过对证伪主义白勺一个实证研究——会计实证研究白勺分析，说明不同学科之间白勺相互支持和优美内在白勺和谐对我们今天各学科白勺理论创新路径白勺探索有着深刻白勺智慧启迪。波普尔自始至终高举理性批判主义白勺旗帜，因此笔者对他白勺证伪理论也展开了批判，从而真正理解证伪主义白勺哲学真谛
Abstract（英文摘要）：www.328tibEt.cn Logical positivi holds the complete empirical-positivist disciplines in truth, deeming those arguments directly or indirectly with experiential test are the verifiable standards for the sense. Karl Popper considered that verification principle can not be used as an universal and efficient one, and based on which he investigated the development mode of scientific knowledge, and put forward his falsification principle.This paper analyzes the falsification thought of Karl Popper, attempting to describe his original thinking clue. Karl Popper considered that the falsification principle has solved the Did Hume’s problem as well as Kant’s problem. The falsifiability refers to the possibility lies in either singular propositions or universal propositions which can prove the proposition false, and all propositions of empirical science are falsifiable. Karl Popper considered that dynamic system of the scientific development lies in suppositions and theoretical propositions for elucidating a certain case, under the initial conditions, to predict the future possibilities. Supposition and argumentation, the two basic links composes of the logic of scientific evolution, and the mode of knowledge accumulation also formulated the core of his science methodology.This paper carefully compared the Popper’s mode and Kun’s mode in science development. Both of them played an important role in history of science, but the author considered that Popper’s mode of scientific development is more clear and definite. This paper also elucidates the great significance of verifiability to the modern science, and through the analysis of an empirical study of verifiability - the empirical study of accountancy, illustrating the inter-supporting and the inside perfecting harmony among different disciplines has profound implications in theoretical innovation of different disciplines nowadays. Popper held the idea of rational critici all the time, therefore the author criticized his falsification theories as well, and gained better understanding of the essence of philosophy.
论文关键词： 可证实性；可证伪性；知识增长模式；批判理性主义；
Key words（英文摘要）：www.328tibEt.cn Verifiability；Falsiability；Mode of Knowledge Accumulation；Critical Rationali；
Abstract（英文摘要）：www.328tibEt.cn Logical positivi holds the complete empirical-positivist disciplines in truth, deeming those arguments directly or indirectly with experiential test are the verifiable standards for the sense. Karl Popper considered that verification principle can not be used as an universal and efficient one, and based on which he investigated the development mode of scientific knowledge, and put forward his falsification principle.This paper analyzes the falsification thought of Karl Popper, attempting to describe his original thinking clue. Karl Popper considered that the falsification principle has solved the Did Hume’s problem as well as Kant’s problem. The falsifiability refers to the possibility lies in either singular propositions or universal propositions which can prove the proposition false, and all propositions of empirical science are falsifiable. Karl Popper considered that dynamic system of the scientific development lies in suppositions and theoretical propositions for elucidating a certain case, under the initial conditions, to predict the future possibilities. Supposition and argumentation, the two basic links composes of the logic of scientific evolution, and the mode of knowledge accumulation also formulated the core of his science methodology.This paper carefully compared the Popper’s mode and Kun’s mode in science development. Both of them played an important role in history of science, but the author considered that Popper’s mode of scientific development is more clear and definite. This paper also elucidates the great significance of verifiability to the modern science, and through the analysis of an empirical study of verifiability - the empirical study of accountancy, illustrating the inter-supporting and the inside perfecting harmony among different disciplines has profound implications in theoretical innovation of different disciplines nowadays. Popper held the idea of rational critici all the time, therefore the author criticized his falsification theories as well, and gained better understanding of the essence of philosophy.
论文关键词： 可证实性；可证伪性；知识增长模式；批判理性主义；
Key words（英文摘要）：www.328tibEt.cn Verifiability；Falsiability；Mode of Knowledge Accumulation；Critical Rationali；